• Vadym Balinskyi Taras Shevchenko National University of Kiev



decentralization, united territorial community, democratization, administrative-territorial system, territory, government, France, Ukraine


This paper outlines the main approaches of the "decentralization" and "local self-government" concept understanding, it identifies the main features of the Ukrainian administrative-territorial system reform and its problematic aspects.

It was found that as a result of the attempt to complete the formation of the UTC, the aspects due to which these territories had previously refused to unite were ignored. Among the key ones: the resistance of local authorities, protection of own interests by local elites, conflict of interests of communities, territorial or resource disparities. These problems have not been resolved and they can significantly impair the further effective operation of the newly established UTCs. That is why this issue is especially relevant today for Ukrainian researchers of public administration.

To develop recommendations for a possible solution to these problems, it was proposed to study the experience of EU member states, which are the most relevant group in the process of Ukraine's integration into the EU. In the context of improving the administrative-territorial system, the most interesting for us is the experience of France, which has a similar territory and is a unitary state. We are also interested in the historical experience of decentralization in France due to its historical duration and the thorough approach of the French government to this issue.

As a result of the scientific literature analysis, it was found that today there are two main aspects that experience of decentralization in France points to:

- support and concentration on the development of small settlements to ensure their further independence – this is the approach of permission;

- introduction of supervision and control over local self-government bodies of newly created UTCs through the legislative implementation of the institute of Prefects;

The first point will allow developing the most vulnerable areas and solving several problems relevant to Ukraine: excessive urbanization, rural extinction, internal migration, lack of innovation and development in the agricultural industry. The second element will allow in the early stages to identify and solve the manifestations of the problems described above, which are due to the acceleration of the creation of UTC.

All the above-mentioned facts demonstrate the continuing need to improve the modern administrative-territorial structure of Ukraine, due to the existing problems in this area and their impact on the prospects for further implementation of the decentralization reform in our country


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Vadym Balinskyi, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kiev

PhD student at the Public administration department


Arkhypenko, I. (2018). Foreign experience of Decentralization of Power: lessons for Ukraine. Public Administration and Local Self-Government, 4(39).
Aslim, E. G., & Neyapti, B. (2017). Optimal fiscal decentralization: Redistribution and welfare implications. Economic Modelling, 61, 224-234.
Bondarenko, O. (2015). Constitutional modernization: concepts and relationships. Our right, 3, 32–36.
Boryslavska, O., Zaverukha, I., & Zakharchenko, E. (2012). Decentralization of public power: the experience of European countries an d prospects of Ukraine Swiss-Ukrainian project Support to Decentralization in Ukraine, DESPRO, Kyiv, Sofia LLC, 128 p.
Chornopysky, P. (2018). Decentralization of power in Ukraine: constitutional and legal aspect. Kharkiv, 235 p.
Cole, A. (2006). Decentralization in France: Central Steering, Capacity Building and Identity Construction. French Politics, 1, 31–57.
Constitution of Ukraine (2014). Retrieved 10.01.2021 from: show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80/page3.
Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B. (2014). The impact of functional decentralization and externalization on local government transparency. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 265-277. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.012.
European Charter of Local Self-Government (2015). Retrieved 10.01.2021 from:
Hong, S., & Lee, S. (2018). Adaptive governance and decentralization: Evidence from regulation of the sharing economy in multi-level governance. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 299-305. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.002.
Hroisman, V. (2015) Detsentralizatsiia v Ukraini: zakonodavchi novatsii ta suspilni spodivannia. Kyiv, In-t zakonodavstva Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 413 p.
Kalinkin, A. (2016). Constitutional reform in the field of decentralization of state power: problems of theory and practice. Dis. PhD. jurid. Science, Kyiv, 198 p.
Kaminska, N. (2013). European system of local and regional self-government (international legal principles of formation, functioning and development): dis. Dr. Jurid. Sciences, Kyiv, nat. Univ. Taras Shevchenko, 474 p.
Khort, I. V. (2015). Novely v systemi vzaiemodii orhaniv mistsevoho samovriaduvannia iz orhaniv derzhavnoi vlady na rehionalnomu rivni v konteksti reformy systemy mistsevoho samovriaduvannia v Ukraini: orhanizatsiino-pravovyi status prefekta. Tendentsii ta priorytety reformuvannia zakonodavstva Ukrainy: proceedings of All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference, Kherson: Helvetyka, p. 45–46.
Zakon Ukrayiny Pro dobrovilni asociacii teritotialnyh hromad (2015). [Law of Ukraine: On Voluntary Association of Territorial Communities]. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada (VVR), № 13, Retrieved from:
Lelechenko, A., Vasilieva, O., Kuybida, V., & Tkachuk, A. (2017). Local government in terms of decentralization of powers. Kyiv, 110 p.
Lyalyuk, A. Y., & Petrenko, I. (2020). Foreign experience of introducing the institute of Prefect and its significance for Ukraine. Kharkiv, Problems of legality, 148.
Meinychuk, O. (1997). Dictionary of foreign words. Kyiv, Main edition of URE, 776 pp.
Nakonechny, V. (2014). Basic world models of local government: a comparative analysis. Theory and practice of public administration, Kharkiv, 1(44).
Official website of decentralization reform (2020). Retrieved 10.01.2021 from:
Parliament has scheduled regular local elections for October 25 (2020). Official website of decentralization reform. Retrieved 10.01.2021 from:
Perrin, C., Nougarèdes, B., Sini, L., Branduini, P., & Salvati, L. (2018). Governance changes in peri-urban farmland protection following decentralisation: A comparison between Montpellier (France) and Rome (Italy). Land Use Policy, 70, 535-546,
Poupeau, F. M. (2020). Everything must change in order to stay as it is. The impossible decentralization of the electricity sector in France. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 120.
Pro vnesennia zmin do Konstytutsii Ukrainy (shchodo detsentralizatsii vlady) (2019). Proekt zakonu Ukrainy [Draft Law on Amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine (on decentralization of power)], № 2598. Retrieved from: webproc4_1? Pf3511 = 67644 [in Ukrainian].
Quelle est la fonction d'un préfet? Vie publique. Retrieved 10.01.2021 from:
Qu'est-ce que la fonction publique territoriale? Vie publique. Retrieved 10.01.2021 from:
Remenyak, O. (2020). Decentralization of public authority in legal theory and state-building practice. Lviv, Nat. Lviv Polytechnic University, 21 p.
Sebi, C., & Vernay, A.-L. (2020). Community renewable energy in France: The state of development and the way forward. Energy Policy, 147.
Shemshuchenko, Y. (2015). The latest constitutional process in Ukraine: the decentralization of power. Kyiv, In Yure Publishing House, 25 pp.
Shmygal, D. (2020). The reform of the administrative-territorial system should be completed this year. Retrieved 10.01.2021 from: news/12529.
Territorial communities (2020). List and basic data. Retrieved 10.01.2021 from:
Yevtushenko, O. (2012). State and community concept of local self-government in Russian political thought of the second half of the XIX century. Retrieved 10.01.2021 from:




How to Cite