MULTIVARIATION OF INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TO EVALUATION AND MODELING OF POPULATION INCOME INEQUALITY

Authors

  • Anton Putytskyi Sumy State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32070/ec.v2i54.145

Keywords:

population income, dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model, economic inequality, Theil index, Atkinson index, Gini coefficient, coefficient of differentiation, Lorenz curve, income inequality

Abstract

The problem of inequality is perceived as a challenge to modern society, since the growth of inequality leads to the deepening of migration processes, increasing social tensions, creating prerequisites for changing the social system, fundamentalisation of religious groups, political instability and military conflicts, economic and humanitarian wars.

This article is an analytical summary of scientific methods for assessing economic inequality. The purpose of the article is to evaluate the inequality of the population of Ukraine by sources of income. In accordance with the set goal, the dynamics of changes in the Gini index by the amount of monetary income were analyzed. The general scientific methods of scientific research and the basic provisions of the theories of socio-economic inequality, economic growth and innovative management became the methodological tools of the conducted research. To determine the degree of inequality of the population in terms of income, the entire spectrum of variation indicators (coefficient of variation, mean square deviation, etc.) was used. At the same time, special coefficients were analyzed, which make it possible not only to assess the degree of income inequality but also to measure the influence of factors on this phenomenon. These are primarily the Lorenz coefficient and the Lorenz curve, the Atkinson index, the Theil index, the decomposition of the specified coefficients, the coefficient of funds, the coefficient of differentiation, and the coefficient of contrasts.

The article decomposes the Gini index by sources of income and identifies the main sources of income that have the greatest impact on the growth of inequality in the distribution of income of the population of Ukraine.

The determination of economic inequality in the distribution of incomes of the population was carried out on the basis of the dynamic stochastic model of general equilibrium (DSGE). In the course of building the DSGE model of inequality of income distribution, three macroeconomic subjects operating in a closed economy were identified, namely households, firms and the state. The total amount of capital invested in a specific sphere of the economy and the total number of the economically active population, which is a parameter of the labour force in the production function, were also used. The obtained results are useful in the study of the issue of determining the causes of the influence of certain factors on the level of income distribution and the possibility of reducing the level of stratification of the population of Ukraine. The results of the conducted research can also be useful for calculating the basic indicators of the socio-economic development of the regions and the country in general.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Anton Putytskyi, Sumy State University

PhD Student, Educational and Scientific Institute of Business, Economics and Management

References

Aliluiko, A. M., & Stefurak, N. A. (2021). Assessment of inequality of the population of Ukraine by sources of income. Innovatsiina ekonomika, 3-4(87), 98-105. https://doi.org/10.37332/2309-1533.2021.3-4.14

Barnett, А., & Ellison, M. (2005). Practical DSGE Modelling. Bank of England. URL: http://users.ox.ac.uk/~exet258l/Boe/dsge_all.pdf

Bazhenova, J.V. (2009). Modeling of the impacts of monetary and fiscal policies on the Ukrainian economy with an open dynamic stochastic model of general equilibrium. Economy and the state, 7, 33-36.

Bondarenko, O. (2018). The influence of monetary policy on redistribution of incomes among generations. Visnyk of the National Bank of Ukraine, 244, 46-63. URL: https://bank.gov.ua/doccatalog/document?id=73007269, DOI: https://doi.org/10.26531/vnbu2018.244.03

Borodchuk, N., & Cherenko, L. (2021). Fighting COVID-19 in Ukraine: Initial estimates of the impact on poverty. Available at: https://www.unicef.org/ukraine/media/5811/file/COVID%20impact%20on%20poverty%20ukr.pdf (access date April 25, 2021).

Bulavynets, V. M., & Zaklekta, O. I. (2017). Income inequality of population in Ukraine: factors and current state. Efektyvna ekonomika, 11. Available at: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=5870 (access date April 25, 2021).

Coulter, P. (1989). Measuring Inequality. Boulder: Westview Press, 198 p.

DeLong, B., Steinbaum, M., & Boushey, H. (2017). After Piketty: The Agenda for Economics and Inequality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 688 p.

Dmytryshyn, L. I. (2013). Modeling the relationship between income inequality and living standards and poverty, Modeliuvannia rehionalnoi ekonomiky, 1,59-70.

Giny index according to the World Bank. Available at: http://data.un.org/Data.aspx?d=WDI&f=Indicator_Code%3ASI.POV.GINI (access date April 25, 2023).

Gorodetska, T. E. (2012). The influence of differentiation in incomes on social shocks formations in a society. Foreign Trade: Law, Economics, Finance, 3, 94-99. http://zt.knteu.kiev.ua/files/2012/03(62)2012/3_12_13.pdf

Hayashida, M., Nanba, R., Yasuoka, M., & Ono, H. (2017). Tax Incidence in DSGE Model. The Society for Economic Studies the University of Kitakyush. URL: https://www.kitakyu-u.ac.jp/economy/study/pdf/2016/2016_08.pdf

Hvelesiani, A.H. (2009). The estimation of cash income structure by using Gini coefficient decomposition in Ukraine. Demohrafiia ta sotsialna ekonomika, 2(12), 153-161.

Holmes, А. (2014). Some economic effects of inequality. URL: https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/BriefingBook44p/EconEffects

Jenkins, S. P. (1995). Accounting for Inequality Trends: Decomposition Analyses for the UK, 1971- 1986. Economica, 62, 139-191.

Kholod, N. M. (2009). Rozpodil dokhodiv ta bidnist u perekhidnykh ekonomikakh [Income distribution and poverty in transition economies], monograph, Vydavnychyi tsentr LNU im. Ivana Franka, Lviv, Ukraine, 442 p.

Kotsan, L. M. (2018). Transformation of the regulation system of income in Ukraine, 215 p.

Kostrobii, P., Kavalets, I., & Hnativ, L. (2013). Mathematical modelling of social inequality index. Fizyko-matematychne modeliuvannia ta informatsiini tekhnolohii, 17, 81-91.

Lavruk, I. H., Todoriuk, S. I., & Kyfiak, V. I. (2019). Income inequality in Ukraine. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid, 11, 40-44.

Libanova, E. M. (2016). Ukraine: the depth of inequality. ZN, UA. https://dt.ua/columnists/ukrayina-glibina-nerivnosti-220460_.html

Libanova, E. M. (2020). Bidnist naselennia Ukrainy: metodolohiia, metodyka ta praktyka analizu [Poverty of the population of Ukraine: methodology, methods and practice of analysis], Vydavets “Sochinskyi M.M.”, Uman, Ukraine, 456 p.

Miroshnichenko, G. O. (2011). Modeling of the dynamic equilibrium of the economic system. Effective economy. http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=619

Nivorozhkina, L. (1998). Methods for decomposition of the Gini coefficient by components of total income. Voprosy statistiki, 5, 61-67.

Polbin, A. V. (2018). The construction of a dynamic stochastic model of general equilibrium for the Russian economy. https://www.iep.ru/files/news/Polbin.pdf

Prymostka, O. O. (2016). Methodological approaches to assessing quality of life indicators of populations Ukraine. Rehionalna ekonomika, 2(80), 80-88.

Semenov, V. V. (2008). Ekonomiko-statystychni modeli ta metody doslidzhennia sotsialnykh protsesiv: nerivnist, bidnist, poliaryzatsiia: v 2 t. [Economic and statistical models and methods of studying social processes: inequality, poverty, polarization: in 2 Vol.], monograph, RVV PUSKU, Poltava, Ukraine, Vol. 1,237 p.

Shcherba, Kh. I. (2013). Income distribution in Ukraine and decomposition of the Gini coefficient. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu "Lvivska politekhnika". Menedzhment ta pidpryiemnytstvo v Ukraini: etapy stanovlennia i problemy rozvytku, 767, 368-373.

Shorrocks, A. F. (1982). Inequality decomposition by factor components. Econometrica, 50, 193-211.

State Statistics Service (2021). Expenditure and resources of households of Ukraine in 2010-2020 years: statistical collection. Available at: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ (access date April 25, 2023).

State Statistics Service (2022). Available at: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua (access date April 25, 2023).

Stiglitz, J. (2017). Income Inequality and Social, Economic, and Political Instability. World Government Summit. URL: https://www8.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/jstiglitz/sites/jstiglitz/files/Inequality%20and%20Economic%20Growth.pdf

Tovar, C. E. (2008). DSGE Models and Central Banks. BIS Working Papers, 253.

Peterson, E. (2017). Is Economic Inequality Really a Problem? A Review of the Arguments. Social Sciences, 6(4), 147. MDPI AG. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/socsci6040147

World Happiness Report (2021). Available at: https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2021 (access date April 25, 2021).

Workshop "The applying of dynamic stochastic models of general equilibrium (DSGE) in central banks" (2018). URL: https://bank.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=83203373&cat_id=83203329

Yitzhaki, S., & Schechtman, E. (2013). The Gini methodology : a primer on a statistical methodology, Springer, New York, USA, 548 p.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-30

How to Cite

Putytskyi, A. (2022). MULTIVARIATION OF INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TO EVALUATION AND MODELING OF POPULATION INCOME INEQUALITY. European Cooperation, 2(54), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.32070/ec.v2i54.145