• Andrii Skrypnyk National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
  • Nataliia Klymenko National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
  • Inna Kostenko National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
Keywords: indicative cost, minimum tuition fee, educational services, educational services market, demand, supply, higher education


The paper considers the impact of the indicative cost of education (the minimum amount of tuition fees on the contractual basis (contract) at the expense of individuals/legal entities) in state higher education institutions on the Ukrainian market of educational services. It demonstrates that the introduction of the indicative cost of higher education by the state institutions of higher education was accessible through the application of the dumping strategy – by using the budget funds to educate fee-paying students. Under such conditions, the share of private higher education was not more than 10 percent of the total number of fee-paying students. The present paper aims to assess the impact of the introduction of the indicative cost of education on the relationship between private and public higher education, and the shift of the equilibrium cost of education. It is determined that this indicator is calculated according to a simplified algorithm individually for each state higher education institution and does not fully consider all the actual costs of the educational process. At the same time, such an implementation does not allow public institutions to use the dumping strategy and over time will change the ratio of quantitative indicators of private and public higher education in Ukraine. The sample flowchart displaying the supply and demand for the speciality “Economics” illustrates how the ratio of students studying on a contractual basis in private and state higher education institutions will change at different ratios of the indicative cost and the equilibrium cost of education in the speciality “Economics” according to the 2019 data. It was concluded that, in general, the introduction of the indicative cost of education would subsequently lead to significant changes in the ratio of private and public higher education institutions, their student population under contract (fee-paying students) where the main factors will be the customer’s fiscal capacity and the income, they provide. As a result, there will be a shift of the equilibrium point for most in-demand specialities in the direction of increasing the cost of training and reducing the volume of final contracts between the applicants and higher educational institutions.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Andrii Skrypnyk, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

Professor, Department of Economic Cybernetics


Nataliia Klymenko, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

Associate professor, Department of Economic Cybernetics

Inna Kostenko, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

PhD Student



Azarnert, L. (2010). Free education, fertility and human capital accumulation. Journal Of Population Economics, 23(2), 449-468.

Becker, E. G, Burdelova, T. N, & Yudanov, A. Yu. (2012). Brand and economic stability of the university (monograph). Moscow: KNORUS, p. 208

Chang, P., & Huang, F. (2014). Trade and divergence in education systems. International Economic Review, 55(4), 1251-1280. Retrieved 14.06.2019 from

Deyaki pytannya zaprovadzhennya indykatyvnoyi sobivartosti: Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrayiny vid 03.03.2020 № 191 [Some issues of introduction of indicative cost: Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated March.03, 2020 № 191]. Retrieved 11.06.2020 from

Dźwigoł, H. (2018). Higher education in the era of global economy. Macrotheme Review, 7(4), 48-62. Retrieved 21.07.2020 from

Ecwert, B., & Zilcha, I. (2012). Private Investment in Higher Education: Comparing Alternative Funding Schemes. Economica, 79(313), 76–96.

Finikov, T. V. (2012). Vkhodzhennya natsionalʹnoyi systemy vyshchoyi osvity v yevropeysʹkyy prostir vyshchoyi osvity ta naukovoho doslidzhennya : monitorynhove doslidzhennya: analitynyy zvit [Entry of the national system of higher education into the European space of higher education and research: monitoring study: analytical report]. Kyiv: Taxon, p. 54. Retrieved 11.06.2020 from

Finikov, T. V., & Sharov, O. I. (2014). Monitorynh intehratsiyi ukrayinsʹkoyi systemy vyshchoyi osvity v Yevropeysʹkyy prostir vyshchoyi osvity ta naukovoho doslidzhennya [Monitoring the integration of the Ukrainian higher education system into the European Higher Education and Research Area]. Kyiv: Taxon, p. 144. Retrieved 11.06.2020 from

Gapinski, A. J. (2010). Higher Education: Europe vs. USA. Eighth LACCEI Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology (LACCEI’2010) "Innovation and Development for the Americas". Retrieved 11.06.2020 from

Gonca, A. G., & Goksu, G. A. (2015). Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Financing in Different Countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 1152-1158.

Halasz, G. (2015). Education and Social Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Education, 50(3), 350-371.

Information system "Contest" (2019) Introductory campaign 2019. Retrieved 11.06.2020 from

Kostenko, I. S. (2020). Rolʹ indykatyvnoyi sobivartosti u formuvanni rynku osvitnikh posluh v Ukrayini [The role of indicative cost in the formation of the market of educational services in Ukraine]. Businessinform, 5, 295–305.

Kvit, S. (2019). Dorozhnya karta reformuvannya vyshchoyi osvity Ukrayiny [Roadmap for reforming higher education in Ukraine]. Portal hromadsʹkykh portal «Osvitnya polityka». Retrieved 11.06. 2020 from

Lawrence, Т. N. (2001). Science, politics and moral activism: Sorokin’s integralism reconsidered (Return of Pitirim Sorokin). Moscow: International Kondratieff foundation, р. 217-237

Mendolicchio, C., Paolini, D., & Pietra, Т. (2014). Income Taxes, Subsidies to Education, and Investments in Human Capital. Journal Of Public Economic Theory, 16(1), 24-47.

Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (2020) Minimalʹna vartistʹ kontraktnoho navchannya 2020 [Minimum cost of contract training 2020] Retrieved 23.06.2020 from

Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (2020) Vartistʹ kontraktnoho navchannya maye vidpovidaty faktychnym vytratam universytetu – uryad ukhvalyv postanovu pro indykatyvnu sobivartistʹ [The cost of contract tuition must correspond to the actual costs of the university - the government has adopted a resolution on the indicative cost] Retrieved 11.06.2020 from

Restuccia, D., & Vandenbroucke, G. (2013, July) The evolution of education: a macroeconomic analysis. International Economic Review, 54(3), 915-936.

Sabloff, P. L. W. (1999). Higher Education in the Post-Communist World. Case Studies of eight universities. Carland Publishing: Routledge Library Editions: Higher Education

Skrypnyk, A. V. (2010). Osvita, indeks spryynyattya koruptsiyi ta motyvatsiyni modeli koruptsiynoyi povedinky [Education, corruption perception index and motivational models of corrupt behavior] Economy of Ukraine, 2, 18–35.

Skrypnyk, A. V., Klymenko, N. A., & Kostenko, I. S. (2020). Rivenʹ osvichenosti naselennya v haluzi tsyfrovykh tekhnolohiy ta zrostannya ekonomik krayin [Level of education of the population in the field of digital technologies and growth of economies of countries] Information Technologies and Teaching Aids, 78(4), 278-297.

Skrypnyk, A. V., Kostenko, I. S. (2020). Ekonometrychnyy analiz popytu ta propozytsiyi osvitnikh posluh za spetsialʹnistyu 051 «Ekonomika» [Econometric analysis of demand and supply of educational services in the specialty 051 "Economics"]. Businessinform, 4, 279–288.

Skrypnyk, A. V., Oborska, I. S. (2015). Otsinka efektyvnosti vyshchoyi osvity [Estimation of efficiency of higher education], Problemy ekonomiky, 4, 53-61. Retrieved 11.06.2020 from

Skrypnyk, A. V., & Oborska, I. S. (2016). Systemna ta nesystemna koruptsiya v osviti: ihrova modelʹ [Systemic and non-systemic corruption in education: a game model], Problemy ekonomiky, 4, 273-278. Retrieved 11.06.2020 from

Skrypnyk, A. V., & Oborska, I. S. (2017). Optymizatsiyna stratehiya kafedry ta universytetu [Otimization strategy of the department and the university]. International scientific journal "Internauka", 7. Retrieved 11.06.2020 from

Smith, A. (2001). The Welfare of Nations. Research on the nature and causes of the well-being of nations (translated from English by O. Vasiliev and others, edited by E. Lytvyn). Kyiv: Port-Royal, p. 594.

Stiglitz, J. (1997). Public Sector Economics, Moscow: Infra-M, p. 720.

Sting, S., & Wulf, Ch. (1994). Education in a Period or Social Upheaval. Educational Theories and Concepts in Central East Europe. Retrieved 11.06.2020 from

Svirko, S., & Trosteniuk, T. (2020). Theoretical and methodological regulations of management control in state higher education institutions. European Cooperation, 1(45), 63-75.

Szelenyi, I., & Wilk, K. (2010). Institutional Transformation in European Post-Communist Regimes. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis.

Tilea, D. M., & Vasile, B. (2014). Modern Trends in Higher Education Funding. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Science, 116, 2226-2230.

Unified State Electronic Database on Education (2020) Open registry data. Retrieved 11.06.2020 from

Wit, H., Hunter, F., Howard, L., & Egron-Polak E. (2015). Internationalisation of higher education. Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies. Retrieved 11.06.2020 from

World Bank Group (2017). Higher Education for Development : An Evaluation of the World Bank Group’s Support. World Bank, Washington. Retrieved 11.06.2020 from

How to Cite
Skrypnyk, A., Klymenko, N., & Kostenko, I. (2020). INDICATIVE COST OF EDUCATIONAL SERVICES AS A WAY TO OPTIMIZE UKRAINIAN HIGHER EDUCATION. European Cooperation, 4(48), 7-21.